BLAKE et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al

Filing 64

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT THREE OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE; DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT FOUR OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR REPLY IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/28/18. 3/28/18 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHRISTOPHER BLAKE and
JAMES ORKIS, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
CHASE BANK USA, N.A.,
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., and
CROSS COUNTRY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 13-6433

ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2018, upon consideration of the defendants,
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Bank USA, N.A., JP Morgan Chase & Co., and
Cross Country Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. No.
52), the plaintiffs’ response in opposition (Doc. No. 55), defendants’ reply (Doc. No. 56),
defendants’ notice of supplemental authority (Doc. No. 61), and plaintiff’s response to
defendants’ supplemental authority (Doc. No. 62), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as
follows:
1) Defendants’ motion to dismiss Count Three of the Amended Complaint is
granted with prejudice;
2) Defendant’s motion to dismiss Count Four of the Amended Complaint is
granted without prejudice; and

3) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a sur reply (doc. No. 57) is denied as moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, C.J.