MCGINNISS v. NAZARETH BOROUGH et al

Filing 42

ORDER/OPINION THAT 1.) THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 24) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEW ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT. 2.) THE MOTION TO DISMISS, IN PART, PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT DAN TROXELL (DOC. NO. 31) IS GRANTED AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT TROXELL ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/1/15. 4/2/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_________________________________________
CONNIE McGINNESS
v.
NAZARETH BOROUGH, et al.
_________________________________________

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-7087

ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2015, for the reasons more fully set forth
in the memorandum accompanying this order:
1. The “Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pe. 12(b)(6) Filed on Behalf of Defendants Nazareth
Borough, Thomas Trachta, and Scott Ledo” (doc. no. 24) is denied, without
prejudice, to renew on summary judgment.
2. The “Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Filed on Behalf of Defendant Dan Troxell”
(doc. no. 31) is granted and all claims against defendant Troxell are dismissed,
with prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR., J.