SERRANO v. COLVIN

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 14) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. DEFENDANTS OBJECTION TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 16) IS OVERRULED. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED AND THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER SENTENCE FOUR 42 U.S.C.405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 14) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS REMAND ONLY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 12/9/15. 12/10/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANGELA M. SERRANO, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-7221 v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of December 2015, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Doc. No. 14), Defendant’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16), and Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Objection (Doc. No. 17), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Defendant’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) is OVERRULED. 3. Plaintiff’s request for review is GRANTED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14); and 4. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, reversing the decision of the Commissioner for the purpose of this remand only. 1 5. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s / J oel H. S l om s k y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?