HARTMAN v. CADMUS-CENVEO COMPANY

Filing 22

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED; 2. THIS CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA; 3. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS MOOT; AND 4. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/19/2014. 9/19/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND COPY SENT TO LEGAL INTELLIGENCER.(lbs, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STACIE HARTMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CADMUS-CENVEO COMPANY,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-7494

ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2014, after considering the motion to remand
(Doc. No. 13) filed by the plaintiff, Stacie Hartman, and the response to the motion to remand
(Doc. No. 15) filed by the defendant, Cadmus-Cenveo Company, and after also considering the
motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim (Doc. No. 12) filed by the
defendant, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
1.

The motion to remand (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED;

2.

This case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County,

Pennsylvania;
3.

The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED AS MOOT; and

4.

The clerk of court shall CLOSE this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.