KOPKO v. LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK et al

Filing 54

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, AND THE PARTIES' REPLY AND SUR REPLY BRIEF IS GRANTED; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK AND LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL AGAINST PATTI KOPKO ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE COMPLAINT AND THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 10/31/16. 11/1/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PATTI KOPKO, Plaintiff, v. LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, et al., : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1290 Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2016, after consideration of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 43), plaintiff’s response in opposition (Doc. No. 44), and the parties’ reply and sur reply briefs (Doc. Nos. 48, 52), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 43) is GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED for Lehigh Valley Health Network and Lehigh Valley Hospital against Patti Kopko on the entirety of the complaint. This case is CLOSED. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?