DUNCAN v. THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL

Filing 56

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL OR FULL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL AGAINST PATRICK DUNCAN ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE COMPLAINT AND THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/29/16. 3/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PATRICK DUNCAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 14-1305

ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of (1) Plaintiff Patrick
Duncan’s Motion for Partial or Full Summary Judgment (Docket No. 31), Plaintiff’s Proposed
Undisputed Statement of Facts (Docket No. 32), Defendant Chester County Hospital’s Response
in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial or Full Summary Judgment (Docket No. 36), and
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Proposed Undisputed Statement of Facts (Docket No. 37);
(2) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 33), Defendant’s Statement of
Undisputed Material Facts (Docket No. 34), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 42), Plaintiff’s Statement of Disputed Genuine
Issues of Material Fact (Docket No. 43), Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Statement of
Undisputed Material Facts (Docket No. 44), and Defendant’s Reply (Docket No. 47); and (3)
Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law Supplementing His Summary Judgment Positions (Docket No.
53) and Defendant’s Response (Docket No. 54), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion
for Partial or Full Summary Judgment is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment is GRANTED.

JUDGMENT IS ENTERED for Chester County Hospital against Patrick Duncan on the
entirety of the Complaint.
This case is CLOSED.
It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

_/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel __
_
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.