DAVIS v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al

Filing 87

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IS DENIED; PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE HIS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 53 AND 71) WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 10/20/14. 10/21/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS.(fdc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PETER DAVIS
Plaintiff,
v.
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., et al,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
14-1490

ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of October 2014, upon consideration of defendants’
motion for leave to file an amended complaint (docs. no. 75 and 76), defendants’
response in opposition (doc. no. 78) and plaintiff’s reply thereto (doc. no. 80), and upon
further consideration of plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended memorandum of
law (doc no 85) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED;

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended memorandum of law is

DENIED; 1
3.

Plaintiff shall file his response to defendants’ motions to dismiss (doc. nos.

53 and 71) within 14 days of the entry of this order.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

1

Mr. Davis has not filed a response to defendants Edwards, Grimes, Harry, Korszniak, Lee, Mooney, Oppman,
Scharff, Wenerowicz, Wetzel and Wolfgang’s motion to dismiss, so there is no need to file an amended
memorandum of law. See doc. no. 81. To the extent Mr. Davis wishes to amend his response to the
Commonwealth’s motion to dismiss, Barkes will not advance is cause.