POINDEXTER v. CAMERON et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED BY PRO SE PETITIONER ERIC POINDEXTER, AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY DATED MAY 19, 2015, AND NO OBJECTIONS HAVING BEEN FILED, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/23/15. 6/25/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ERIC POINDEXTER,
Petitioner,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
KENNETH CAMERON, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OR PENNSYLVANIA,
Respondents.

NO. 14-1891

ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Petition Under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by pro se petitioner, Eric
Poindexter, the record in this case, and the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey dated May 19, 2015, no objections having been filed, IT IS
ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T.

Hey dated May 19, 2015, is APPROVED and ADOPTED; and,
2.

Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State

Custody filed by pro se petitioner, Eric Poindexter, is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue because
reasonable jurists would not debate this Court’s decision that the petition does not state a valid
claim of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.