WILLIAMS v. WELLS FARGO BANK
Filing
38
ORDER THAT: 1. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 20) IS GRANTED; 2. JUDGEMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE COMPLAINT; AND 3. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 4/9/2015. 4/9/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2345
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, after considering the motion for summary
judgment, and accompanying materials, filed by the defendant (Doc. No. 20), the response in
opposition to the motion, and accompanying materials, filed by the plaintiff (Doc. Nos. 28-33),
and the reply in support of the motion filed by the defendant (Doc. No. 34); and after oral
argument held before the undersigned on March 13, 2015; and after conducting an independent
review of the record pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c)(3); and it appearing that
the defendant has shown that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that it is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); accordingly, and for the reasons
expressed in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED;
2.
Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff on the
entirety of the complaint; and
3.
The clerk of court is DIRECTED to mark this matter as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?