JANE DOE et al v. THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, LLC

Filing 23

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/14/2015. 1/15/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, ) Modified on 1/15/2015 (tjd).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE,
parents and natural guardians of
MARY DOE, a minor

C.A. NO. 14-4423

v.

THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL
COMPANY, LLC

F~LED
JA.I'
• f•l

!1

J
-'

{.

1r;
f
._J

MICHAEL[, i~L0~.

B~· =--=-.c-~-"""~D~~).

ORDER

(c

1¥'

AND NOW,

this/~ day of January, 2015, upon consideration of the defendant's

motion to dismiss based onforum non conveniens grounds, and all responses and replies thereto,
it is hereby ORDERED that the motion [Doc. 17] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to

plaintiffs pursuing this action in the Cayman Islands.
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk is DIRECTED to mark this case closed for

statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT: