JANE DOE et al v. THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, LLC
Filing
41
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(b)(6) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/7/2015. 12/8/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE,
parents and natural guardians of
MARY DOE, a minor
C.A. NO. 14-4423
v.
THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL
COMPANY,LLC
fJ--
AND NOW, this
7
ORDER
day of December, 2015, upon consideration of the
plaintiffs motion for relief under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and all
responses and replies thereto, and after having heard oral argument on the motion, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion [Doc.26] is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
