WEITTZEL v. THOMPSON et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 13) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 7/22/15. 7/23/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMPSON, et al.,
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July 2015, upon careful and independent review of
Petitioner Mark Weitzel’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No.
1), upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Timothy R. Rice (Doc. No. 13), and upon noting that no objections to the Report and
Recommendation have been filed, despite an extension of time for Petitioner to do so (see Doc.
No. 17), it is hereby ORDERED that:
The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED
without an evidentiary hearing.
No certificate of appealability shall issue.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Legrome D. Davis
Legrome D. Davis, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?