CALLI v. ARC MAINTENANCE, INC. et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 24, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: A. THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO COUNT I, ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF THE OVERTIME PROVISIONS OF THE FLSA, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/21/16. 1/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ARC MAINTENANCE, INC., CRAIG D.
COTURE, SCOTT LUTZ, and GARY LUTZ, :
NOW, this 21st day of January, 2016, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum issued
this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part as follows:
The motion is denied as to Count I, alleging a violation of the overtime
provisions of the FLSA;
The motion is denied as moot as to Count II, alleging retaliation in
violation of the FLSA, because this claim was previously dismissed;
The motion is denied as to Count III, alleging a violation of the PMWA;
The motion is granted as to Count IV, alleging a violation of the WPCL,
and this count is dismissed; and
The motion is granted as to Count V, alleging unjust enrichment, and this
Count is dismissed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.___________
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?