THIESSEN v. BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC et al

Filing 29

OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 12) IS GRANTED, AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY (DOC. NO. 23) IS DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/11/15. 6/12/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PAUL THIESSEN

v.

C.A. NO. 14-5520

BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER &
MOORE, LLC, and PORTFOLIO
RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, and
X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS

ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of the defendants=
motion to dismiss and all responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion
to dismiss [Doc. 12] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
It is further Ordered that plaintiff=s motion for an extension of time to complete
discovery [Doc23] is DENIED as moot.
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall mark this case closed for statistical
purposes.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.