THIESSEN v. BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC et al

Filing 29

OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 12) IS GRANTED, AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY (DOC. NO. 23) IS DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/11/15. 6/12/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAUL THIESSEN v. C.A. NO. 14-5520 BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC, and PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of the defendants= motion to dismiss and all responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss [Doc. 12] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further Ordered that plaintiff=s motion for an extension of time to complete discovery [Doc23] is DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?