ARNDT v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. MORTGAGE CONTRACTING AND SERVICES

Filing 12

ORDER THAT THE RESPECTIVE MOTIONS TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANTS WELLS FARGO AND MCS ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 5/20/15. 5/20/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAURIE ARNDT, : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., MORTGAGE CONTRACTING AND SERVICES a/k/a MORTGAGE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION No. 14-5586 Order This 20th day of May, 2015, for the reasons stated in my accompanying memorandum opinion, the respective Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Wells Fargo and MCS are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Invasion of Privacy – Intrusion Upon Seclusion) are GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Count V of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) are GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Count VI of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress) are GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 4. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages are DENIED without prejudice to Defendants to reassert their arguments at summary judgment. 5. Plaintiff may amend her Complaint without leave of Court within 21 days of the entry of this Order. /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?