REESE et al v. POOK & POOK, LLC et al

Filing 64

ORDER THAT DEFT CAFFARELLA'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLFFS' RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. #58) WAS INADVERTENTLY FILED AS A MOTION. THE INTERIM CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THAT DOCUMENT DENIED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/22/16. 9/22/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION

CARTER P. REESE, et al.,
Plaintiffs

N0.14-5715

vs.

POOK & POOK, LLC, et al.,
Defendants
ORDER
AND NOW, this

dJv\

day of September, 2016, upon consideration of

Defendant Caffarella's motion for reconsideration (Document #55), and the plaintiffs'
response thereto (Document #58), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

1. Paragraph Four of my Order dated January 27, 2016 (Document #51) is
AMENDED to reflect that Defendant Caffarella's motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to
Count VIII (breach of fiduciary duty).
2. The motion for reconsideration is DENIED in all other aspects.
3. The plaintiffs' response to the motion for reconsideration (Document #58) was
inadvertently filed as a motion. The Interim Clerk of Court is directed to mark that
document DENIED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:

9t;Nl4.kiGEL,

J.