THOMAS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

Filing 12

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 3/30/15. 3/30/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

'i

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

i

I

i',,
11

VINCENT THOMAS,
Petitioner,

CIVIL ACTION

v.

No. 14-5963

PE~1SYLVANIA BOARD OF
PAR@LE AND PROBATION, et al.,

Respondent~

. !'

FILED
MAR 3 0~2015
lllllCHAEL
B)7. . F KUN, Clerk
'•
--=-oep. Clerk

i':

ORDER
AND NOW, this 30"' day of March, 2015, upon consideration of the Petition

[Ii'

,,
I

',

rrit o,,'

Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Respondents' Answer thereto (Doc. No. 8), the Report and; .
.

, ,

Rd:o~endation of United States Ma~strate Judge M:

11

Faith Angell dated FebfWU")1125 2015!'

(D~·t;l'lo. 10), after a thorough and mdependent review of the record, and there
.

I

11

e I g nol,

1

.

'I

obj;ec~i1ons to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:
I

I

1

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with

I

prejq~iq~ and
!

I

i j

DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
:

I'

BY THE COURT:

I':'

i

I
'

I'

·~rrfi~RED

M~~, is o 1.0\S

~Ofc;OllM
1,:
1::

i'

L S. GOLDBERG, J.

-~

Ii
!I

·

·

...

!,