FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON D.C. v. B.R. KREIDER & SON, INC. et al

Filing 50

ORDER THAT MOTION OF DEFT B.R. KREIDER & SON, INC. TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT OF PLFF (DOC. ENTRY NO. 21) IS GRANTED. MOTION OF DEFT TIMOTHY HAAS & ASSOCIATES TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT OF PLFF (DOCKET ENTRY NO. 33) IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT OF PLFF IS D ISMISSED. MOTION OF PLFF TO FILE SUR-REPLY IN FURTHER OPPOSITION TO DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. MOTION OF DEFT B.R. KREIDER & SON, INC. TO FILE ADDITIONAL BRIEF IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/24/16. 3/25/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D.C. : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : B.R. KREIDER & SON, INC., : PERRROTTO BUILDERS, LTD., : TIMOTH HAAHS & ASSOCIATES, and : RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY : : Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6065 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of March 2016, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion of Defendant B.R. Kreider & Sons, Inc. to Dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiff Firemen’s Insurance Company of Washington, D.C. (Docket Entry No. 21) is GRANTED. 2. The Motion of Defendant Timothy Haahs & Associates to Dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiff Firemen’s Insurance Company of Washington D.C. (Docket Entry No. 33) is GRANTED. 3. The Complaint of Plaintiff Firemen’s Insurance Company of Washington D.C. is DISMISSED. 4. The Motion of Plaintiff Firemen’s Insurance Company of Washington D.C. to File Sur-Reply in Further Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 4) is GRANTED. 5. The Motion of Defendant B.R. Kreider & Son, Inc. to File Additional Brief (Docket Entry No. 46) is GRANTED. 6. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case closed. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?