STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. HANCLE
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [#16] IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFF IS UNDER NO DUTY OR OBLIGATION PURSUANT TO THE POLICY OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE ISSUED TO DEFENDANT GREGORY HANCL E TO PROVIDE ANY COVERAGE UNDER THE POLICY TO DEFENDANT GREGORY HANCLE, INTERESTED PARTY NICOLE HANCLE, AND/OR INTERESTED PARTY NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION FOR ANY CLAIMS FOR COVERAGE STEMMING FROM THE 2/2/14 AUTOMOBILE VEHICLE ACCIDENT IN BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/21/16. 7/21/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO INTERESTED PARTIES AND UNREP.(fdc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE FARM FIRE AND
GREGORY A. HANCLE,
NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE
CORP., and NICOLE HANCLE,
AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2016, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s
motion for judgment on the pleadings (Document #16), and any responses thereto, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff is under no duty or obligation
pursuant to the policy of automobile insurance issued to Defendant Gregory Hancle to
provide any coverage under the policy to Defendant Gregory Hancle, Interested Party
Nicole Hancle, and/or Interested Party Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation for any
claims for coverage stemming from the February 2, 2014 automobile vehicle accident in
Brooklyn, New York.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?