DAVIS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Filing 49

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 39 ) IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 40 ) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 7/7/16. 7/8/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREPS, E-MAILED.(mas, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARC DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
v.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-6242

MICHAEL A. BATEMAN, Deputy Warden of
Classification; MARK BARTHOLOMEW,
Grievance Supervisor; CORRECTION OFFICER
BRAD NICHOLAS; CORRECTION OFFICER
MICHAEL DIACOGIANNIS; CORRECTION
OFFICER EDWARD RODRIGUEZ;
CORRECTION OFFICER MICHAEL MAZUR;
and JANE DOE CORRECTION OFFICER,
Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment and defendants’ motion for summary judgment and all responses
and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follow:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 39 ] is DENIED.
2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. 40] is GRANTED.
3. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff.
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.