PETTWAY v. COLVIN
ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IS DENIED; 3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT, CA ROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF, TANISHA PETTWAY; AND 4. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 10/12/2016. 10/12/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s
Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, Defendant’s Response
thereto and Plaintiff’s Reply, as well as the record therein, and after review of the Report
and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin and Plaintiff’s
objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s Request for Review of the decision of the Commissioner of the
Social Security Administration is DENIED;
3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff, Tanisha Pettway; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?