SHUMANIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al

Filing 15

OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 9) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE COMPLAINT; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 3/29/16. 3/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARLES SHUMANIS, Plaintiff, v. LEHIGH COUNTY, WARDEN DALE MEISEL, WARDEN JANINE DONATE, SERGEANT ERIC SABORSKY, CORRECTION OFFICER RONALD MARCH, and CORRECTION OFFICER ERIC NOWICKI, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6560 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, after considering the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, Lehigh County, Warden Dale Meisel, Warden Janine Donate, Sergeant Eric Saborsky, Correction Officer Ronald March, and Correction Officer Eric Nowicki (Doc. No. 9), and after reviewing the complaint (Doc. No. 1), the defendants’ answer and affirmative defenses (Doc. No. 3), and the response to the motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, Charles Shumanis (Doc. No. 10); and after hearing oral argument from the parties on July 23, 2015; and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the defendants, Lehigh County, Warden Dale Meisel, Warden Janine Donate, Sergeant Eric Saborsky, Correction Officer Ronald March, and Correction Officer Eric Nowicki, and against the plaintiff, Charles Shumanis, on the entirety of the complaint; and 3. The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?