MUFFLEY v. CAMERON et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MAKR THIS MATTER CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 1/10/18. 1/11/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAM J. MUFFLEY
THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL; and, THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF NORTHAMPTON
AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration
of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Amended Petition (Doc. Nos. 1,
3); the Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 9); Petitioner’s Reply
(Doc. Nos. 10, 11); and after review of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United
States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 12), it is hereby ORDERED that:
The R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice and
DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing;
There is no probable cause to issue a Certificate of Appealability; and,
The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?