MUFFLEY v. CAMERON et al

Filing 21

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS THE R&R ECF NO. 12 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION AND AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ECF NOS. 1 , 3 ARE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; PETITIONERS OBJECTIONS (ECF NO. 18 ARE OVERRULED; AND, THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 5/18/20. 5/18/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd,)

Case 5:15-cv-00152-CDJ Document 21 Filed 05/18/20 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM J. MUFFLEY
Petitioner,
v.

:

:

SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON;
THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL; and THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Respondents.

:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-152

:

ORDER
:
AND NOW, this 18th day of May 2020, upon careful and independent consideration of
the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Amended Petition (ECF Nos. 1, 3); the Response
to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 9); Petitioner’s Reply (ECF Nos. 10, 11); the
Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (ECF
No. 12); Petitioner’s Objections to the R&R (ECF No. 18); and, the Response to said Objections
(ECF No. 19), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
(1)

The R&R (ECF No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

(2)

The Petition and Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Nos.
1, 3) are DENIED with prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary
hearing;

(3)

Petitioner’s Objections (ECF No. 18) are OVERRULED; and,

(4)

There is no probable cause to issue a Certificate of Appealability.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II J.