MAIDEN CREEK ASSOCIATES, L.P. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al

Filing 28

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 18 ) IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 21 ) IS DENIED, AS EXPLAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/20/15. 8/20/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MAIDEN CREEK ASSOCIATES,
L.P., and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF MAIDENCREEK TOWNSHIP,
Plaintiffs,
v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 15-242

ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of defendants’
motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 18) and all responses thereto and plaintiffs’ motion for leave
to file an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 21) and all responses thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED that the defendants’ motion is GRANTED and the plaintiffs’ motion is
DENIED, as explained in the accompanying memorandum. This case is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.