MAIDEN CREEK ASSOCIATES, L.P. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al

Filing 28

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 18 ) IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 21 ) IS DENIED, AS EXPLAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/20/15. 8/20/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MAIDEN CREEK ASSOCIATES, L.P., and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MAIDENCREEK TOWNSHIP, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 15-242 ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 18) and all responses thereto and plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 21) and all responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motion is GRANTED and the plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED, as explained in the accompanying memorandum. This case is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?