FULTZ v. RR DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN

Filing 24

OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ALSO DENIED; AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR A DETERMINATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 5/27/16. 6/1/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PAULA J. FULTZ,
Plaintiff,
v.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-0319

RR DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY LONG
TERM DISABILITY PLAN,
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the parties’ crossmotions for summary judgment, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #11) is DENIED.
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #15) is also DENIED.
3. Notwithstanding the denial of both motions, this matter is REMANDED
to the plan administrator for a determination as described in the
accompanying memorandum opinion.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.