TEJADA v. FORD et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER; THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THE MOTION TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS (NO. 4) IS DENIED; THE MOTION FOR A HEARI NG (NO. 5) IS DENIED; THE MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (NO. 14) IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 12/11/15. 12/11/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RICKY TEJADA, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM E. FORD, JUDGE, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-328 ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2015, after considering the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 6), and the response to the petition filed by the respondents (Doc. No. 25); and after considering all outstanding motions and any responses thereto; and after considering the state-court record; and after considering the report and recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (Doc. No. 27), and the objections to the report and recommendation filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 28); accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The report and recommendation (Doc. No. 27) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petitioner’s objections (Doc. No. 28) are OVERRULED; 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED; 4. The motion to produce documents (Doc. No. 4), to the extent that it is reraised, is DENIED; 5. The motion for a hearing (Doc. No. 5), to the extent that it is reraised, is DENIED; 6. The motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED; 7. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue; and 8. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?