TEJADA v. FORD et al
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER; THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THE MOTION TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS (NO. 4) IS DENIED; THE MOTION FOR A HEARI NG (NO. 5) IS DENIED; THE MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (NO. 14) IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 12/11/15. 12/11/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICKY TEJADA,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM E. FORD, JUDGE, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-328
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2015, after considering the petition for writ of
habeas corpus filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 6), and the response to the petition filed by the
respondents (Doc. No. 25); and after considering all outstanding motions and any responses
thereto; and after considering the state-court record; and after considering the report and
recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (Doc. No. 27), and
the objections to the report and recommendation filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 28);
accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The report and recommendation (Doc. No. 27) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
The petitioner’s objections (Doc. No. 28) are OVERRULED;
3.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED;
4.
The motion to produce documents (Doc. No. 4), to the extent that it is reraised, is
DENIED;
5.
The motion for a hearing (Doc. No. 5), to the extent that it is reraised, is
DENIED;
6.
The motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED;
7.
A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue; and
8.
The clerk of court is DIRECTED to mark this matter as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?