LAPINE v. MATERION CORPORATION

Filing 39

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 5 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: A. THE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION IS GRANTED, AND THIS ACTION IS TRANSFERRED TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DI STRICT OF OHIO; B. THE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILE IN THE TRANSFEREE COURT; AND THE CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 7/21/16. 7/22/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ______________________________________ KEVIN LAPINE, Plaintiff, v. MATERION CORPORATION, Defendant. ______________________________________ : : : : : : No. 5:15-cv-642 ORDER Materion Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5- Granted in Part and Denied in Part NOW, this 21st day of July, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: A. The motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted, and this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; B. The motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is denied without prejudice to refile in the transferee court; and 2. The case is CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jospeh F. Leeson, Jr. JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?