O'CALLAGHAN v. HON. X

Filing 20

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO INFORM THE COURT" (DOCKET NOS. 6,9,16,17 AND 18) ARE GRANTED INSOFAR AS THEY SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH STATUS UPDATES REGARDING THE STATE COURT ACTION THAT GAVE RISE TO THIS MATTER, AND ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN WAS CONSIDERED BY THE COURT IN DECIDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; 2. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DOCKET NO. 10) IS DENIED; 3. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT (DOCK ET NO. 15)IS DENIED AS FUTILE; 4. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 4) IS GRANTED; 5. THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND 6. THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/29/2016. 2/1/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANIEL O'CALLAGHAN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-1716 HON. X, IN PAST OR PRESENT OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE OR SENIOR JUDGE OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff’s response thereto, Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Defendant’s response thereto, and all pending “Motions” filed by Plaintiff seeking to inform the court of the status of the state court action, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s “Motions to Inform the Court” (Docket Nos. 6, 9, 16, 17 and 18) are GRANTED insofar as they sought to provide the Court with status updates regarding the state court action that gave rise to this matter, and all information contained therein was considered by the Court in deciding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 10) is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint (Docket No. 15) is DENIED as futile; 4. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 4) is GRANTED; 5. This matter is dismissed with prejudice; and 6. The clerk shall mark this matter closed. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?