STOUFFER v. THE CITY OF READING et al

Filing 76

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 57 ) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ALL COUNTS OF THE COMPLAINT IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS WILLIAM HEIM, BRIAN NICARRY VAUGHN SPENCER, THE CITY OF READING AND THE JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS AND AG AINST THE PLAINTIFF. PLAINTIFFS NEGLIGENCE CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT OBRIEN WRECKING CO., INC. (COUNT XIV) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT DINOSAUR DEMOLITION, LLCS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 56 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DOC. 71 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. 54 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/13/17. 12/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED. (mas, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HARRY STOUFFER

: CIVIL ACTION
:
: NO. 15-3523
:
:

v.
THE CITY OF READING, et al.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2017, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. 57] is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is entered on all counts of the Complaint in favor of the defendants
William Heim, Brian Nicarry Vaughn Spencer, the City of Reading and the
John Doe defendants and against the plaintiff.
3. Plaintiff’s negligence claim against defendant O’Brien Wrecking Co., Inc.
(Count XIV) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
4. Defendant Dinosaur Demolition, LLC’s motion for summary judgment [Doc.
56] is DENIED as moot.
5. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time [Doc. 71] is DENIED as moot.
6. Defendants’ motion for sanctions [Doc. 54] is DENIED as moot.
7. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.