BRETT v. SAMPSON et al
ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS AND FOR THE FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. THE PLAINTIFF 9;S MOTION TO SEAL IS DENIED AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL UNSEAL THE DOCKET AND ALL DOCUMENTS FILED IN THE CASE; THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/21/2015. 9/22/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ahfsl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAURIE SAMPSON, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-3711
AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2015, after considering the application to
proceed in forma pauperis, motion for appointment of counsel, motion to seal, and complaint
filed by the pro se plaintiff, Frank Brett; and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
The plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and the
plaintiff has leave to proceed in forma pauperis;
This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for the failure
to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii);
The plaintiff’s motion to seal is DENIED and the clerk of court shall UNSEAL
the docket and all documents filed in the case;
The plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED; and
The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith, J.
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?