HINES EL v. MOONEY et al

Filing 8

ORDER THAT: 1. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDAION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 2 THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2254 IS SUMMARILY DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED. 3. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 12/3/2015. 12/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER.(lbs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CRAIG IIlNES EL, Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 15-cv-4103 SUPERINTENDENT MOONEY, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of December , 2015, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that: I. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is SUMMARILY DISMISSED as time barred. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?