HINES EL v. MOONEY et al

Filing 8

ORDER THAT: 1. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDAION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 2 THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2254 IS SUMMARILY DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED. 3. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 12/3/2015. 12/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER.(lbs, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CRAIG IIlNES EL,
Petitioner,

CIVIL ACTION

v.

NO.

15-cv-4103

SUPERINTENDENT MOONEY, et al.,
Respondents.

ORDER

AND NOW, this

3rd

day of

December

, 2015, upon

careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that:

I. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
SUMMARILY DISMISSED as time barred.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

J.