HOLLINGER v. READING HEALTH SYSTEM et al
Filing
35
ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. COUNTS I AND II OF THE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNTS III AND IV ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT V. THE PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/14/2016. 7/14/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES N. HOLLINGER,
Plaintiff,
v.
READING HEALTH SYSTEM, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-5249
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of the defendants’
motion to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 17, 18), the plaintiff’s response (Doc. No. 23), the
defendants’ reply (Doc. No. 26), the plaintiff’s surreply (Doc. No. 29), the defendants’
supplemental submission of authority (Doc. No. 32) and the plaintiff’s response (Doc.
No. 33), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
The defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 17, 18) is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part.
2.
Counts I and II of the plaintiff’s amended complaint are DISMISSED with
prejudice. Counts III and IV are DISMISSED without prejudice. The defendants’
motion to dismiss is DENIED with respect to Count V.
3.
The plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days of the
date of this Order.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?