HOLLINGER v. READING HEALTH SYSTEM et al
Filing
47
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S ADA CLAIM IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFF'S RA CLAIM IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM IS DISMISSED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR DEFENDANTS AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE COMPLAINT. THIS CASE IS CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 1/30/2017. 1/31/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES N. HOLLINGER
Plaintiff,
v.
READING HEALTH SYSTEM, et al.,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-5249
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff’s
second amended complaint (Doc. No. 36), defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 37),
defendants’ memorandum in support of the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 38), plaintiff’s
response in opposition to the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 39), defendants’ reply brief in
support of the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 42), and plaintiff’s sur-reply to defendants’
motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 45), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s ADA claim (Count I) is DISMISSED.
2.
Plaintiff’s RA claim (Count II) is DISMISSED.
3.
Plaintiff’s state law claim (Count V) is DISMISSED.
4.
The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 37) is GRANTED and judgment is
entered for defendants against plaintiff on the entirety of the complaint.
5.
This case is CLOSED.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?