WILKINS v. BERK COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM et al

Filing 38

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 35) IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS ARE ORDERED TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 33) WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/14/17. 6/15/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MAURICE ADRIAN WILKINS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5448 v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of June 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 33), Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 35), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 36), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 35) is DENIED. 2. Defendants are ORDERED to file an Answer to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 33) within fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order. BY THE COURT: / s / J oel H. S l om s k y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?