WILKINS v. BERK COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 35) IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS ARE ORDERED TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 33) WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/14/17. 6/15/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MAURICE ADRIAN WILKINS,
BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, et al.,
AND NOW, this 13th day of June 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Third Amended
Complaint (Doc. No. 33), Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 35), Plaintiff’s Response in
Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 36), and in accordance with the Opinion of the
Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 35) is DENIED.
Defendants are ORDERED to file an Answer to Plaintiff’s Third Amended
Complaint (Doc. No. 33) within fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?