OLICK v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al

Filing 76

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO RECONSIDER THIS COURT'S 11/13/18 ORDER" (DOCKET NO. 53) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR SPOILAGE OF EVIDENCE" (DOCKET NO. 56) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S &quo t;MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY" (DOCKET NO. 65) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO QUASH AND/OR ESTOP PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION" (DOCKET NO. 66) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S "AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY REGARDING ADMISSIONS" (DOCKET NO. 67) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/13/19. 6/13/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(er, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS W. OLICK,
Plaintiff,
v.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-5820

SERGEANT MARACCINI,
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2019, upon review of all pending motions in
this matter and responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Reconsider this Court’s 11/13/18 Order” (Docket No.
53) is DENIED;
2. Plaintiff’s “Motion for Sanctions for Spoilage of Evidence” (Docket No. 56)
is DENIED;
3. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel Discovery” (Docket No. 65) is DENIED as
moot;
4. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Quash and/or Estop Plaintiff’s Deposition” (Docket No.
66) is DENIED as moot; and
5. Plaintiff’s “Amended Motion to Compel Discovery Regarding Admissions”
(Docket No. 67) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.