FISHER v. KING et al
ORDER THAT THE 43 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT, MEGAN L. KING, ESQ. IS GRANTED; THE 44 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT, ERIC ZIMMERMAN, IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 9/22/17. 9/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN R. FISHER,
MEGAN L. KING, ESQ., Individually and in her
Official Capacity as Assistant District Attorney for
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and ERIC
ZIMMERMAN, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as Detective for Northern Lancaster
County Pennsylvania Regional Police Department,
AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2017, after review of the Motion
for Summary Judgment of Defendant King (Docket No. 43) and the Motion for Summary
Judgment of Defendant Zimmerman (Docket No. 44), the Memoranda of Law in support
of both, as well as Plaintiff’s opposition thereto and Defendants’ replies, and after oral
argument being held on said motions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Megan L. King,
Esq. is GRANTED;
2. The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Eric Zimmerman, is
3. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter closed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?