MINIELLY v. ACME CRYOGENICS, INC. et al

Filing 38

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 24 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MY ORDER CORRECTING A DOCKETING ENTRY 36 IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 6/21/17. 6/21/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARD MATTHEW MINIELLY,
Plaintiff
vs.
ACME CRYOGENICS, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-6164

ORDER

AND NOW, this

21st

day of June, 2017, upon consideration of the

defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Document #24),
and the plaintiff’s response thereto (Document #31), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
motion is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of my
Order correcting a docketing entry (Document #36) is DENIED as moot.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.