WM CAPITAL PARTNERS XXXIV, LLC v. BARTHOLOMEW et al
ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION (ECF NO. 15) IS GRANTED; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST JOHN T. RUBLE AND RICHARD C. BENNER AND IN FAVOR OF WM CAPITAL PARTNERS XXXIV, LLC FOR A TOTAL OF $820,479.58, ETC. PLFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 9) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/12/17. 1/12/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO UNREPRESENTED PARTY.(kw, ) (kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WM CAPITAL PARTNERS XXXIV, LLC,
LESLIE C. BARTHOLOMEW, et al.,
AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff WM’s
motion for default judgment against Defendants Ruble and Benner (ECF No. 15), it is hereby
1. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED;
2. Judgment is ENTERED against John T. Ruble and Richard C. Benner and in favor of
WM Capital Partners XXXIV, LLC for a total of $820,479.58, comprised of $791,480.86
in damages, $24,863.50 in attorneys’ fees and $4,135.22 in costs and expenses;
3. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 9) is DENIED as moot.11
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Plaintiff filed this motion on August 5, 2016. (ECF No. 9.) On October 18, 2016 Plaintiff filed another
motion for default judgment that was similar in substance but contained more specific claims for damages,
attorneys’ fees and costs, (ECF No. 15), obviating the need for the Court to rule on the first motion.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?