UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL V. MEDTRONIC, INC.

Filing 38

OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 30) IS GRANTED AND THE CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, MEDTRONIC, INC., ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/19/17. 6/20/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, LOUISIANA, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MONTANA, NEVADA, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, OKLAHOMA, NORTH CAROLINA, RHODE ISLAND, TENNESSEE, TEXAS, VIRGINIA, and WISCONSIN, ex rel. CATHLEEN FORNEY, Plaintiffs/Relator, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-6264 ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2017, after considering the motion to dismiss of the defendant, Medtronic, Inc. (Doc. No. 30), the response in opposition to the motion of the relator, Cathleen Forney (Doc. No. 31), the defendant’s reply memorandum in further support of the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 34), the amended complaint (Doc. No. 17), and the argument of counsel before the court on June 1, 2017; and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED and the claims asserted against the defendant, Medtronic, Inc., are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The relator may file a second amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?