BURNO v. WETZEL et al
ORDER THAT BURNO'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AMEND IS DENIED; BURNO'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED; NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE; & THE CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 11/22/19. 11/22/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN E. WETZEL et al.,
AND NOW, this 22nd day of November 2019, upon consideration of the
Petitioner’s Memorandum of Law in Support of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(ECF No. 60), the Respondent’s Response (ECF No. 74) and the Petitioner’s Reply (ECF
No. 87), as well as Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Supplement or in the Alternative
Amend (ECF No. 88), Respondent’s Response (ECF No. 90) and Petitioner’s Reply (ECF
No. 91), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Burno’s Motion for Leave to Supplement or in the Alternative Amend is
2. Burno’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;
3. No certificate of appealability shall issue; and
4. The case shall be CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?