SCHEINBLUM et al v. LEHIGH VALLEY CHARTER SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS et al

Filing 19

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS 8 MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFFS COUNT IX OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO THE DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 12/19/16. 12/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ RAFE SCHIENBLUM and PHYLLIS AYERS, Plaintiffs, : : : : v. : : LEHIGH VALLEY CHARTER : SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS, : SHARON FEHLINGER-RICKER, : and DIANE LABELLE, : Defendants. : _____________________________________ CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-CV-6433 ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8), the Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion (Docket No. 9), and Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Authorities in Opposition to the Motion (Docket No. 16), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs’ Count IX of the Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages. BY THE COURT /s/ Henry S. Perkin HENRY S. PERKIN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?