SCHEINBLUM et al v. LEHIGH VALLEY CHARTER SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS et al
Filing
19
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS 8 MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFFS COUNT IX OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO THE DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 12/19/16. 12/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________
RAFE SCHIENBLUM and
PHYLLIS AYERS,
Plaintiffs,
:
:
:
:
v.
:
:
LEHIGH VALLEY CHARTER
:
SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS,
:
SHARON FEHLINGER-RICKER,
:
and
DIANE LABELLE,
:
Defendants.
:
_____________________________________
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-CV-6433
ORDER
AND NOW, this
20th
day of December, 2016, upon consideration of the
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8), the Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to the
Motion (Docket No. 9), and Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Authorities in Opposition to the Motion
(Docket No. 16), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to
Plaintiffs’ Count IX of the Amended Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with
respect to the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Henry S. Perkin
HENRY S. PERKIN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?