KERCHER v. THE READING MUHLENBERG CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CENTER
Filing
19
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS I AND II OF THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 27, 2016 TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS I AND II. IT IS ALSO ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS TO ALL REMAINING CLAIMS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 12/5/16. 12/5/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________
:
JEAN KERCHER
:
:
Plaintiff
:
:
v.
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-06674
:
THE READING MUHLENBERG
:
CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CENTER
:
:
Defendant
:
___________________________________ :
ORDER
AND NOW, this
5th
day of December, 2016, upon consideration of the Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5), the Response to the Motion (Docket No.9), Defendant’s
Reply Brief (Docket No. 12), and Plaintiff’s Supplemental Brief in Response (Docket No. 14),
and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts I and II
of the Plaintiff’s Complaint and Plaintiff shall have until December 27, 2016 to file a Second
Amended Complaint with respect to Counts I and II.
IT IS ALSO ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to all
remaining claims.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Henry S. Perkin
HENRY S. PERKIN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?