TAGGART et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al

Filing 26

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY IS DENIED. COUNTS I, II, III, AND VI OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNTS IV AND V OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF HAS 20 DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/30/2016. 9/30/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KENNETH J. TAGGART,
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 16-00063

ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2016, upon consideration of the Motions
to Dismiss by Defendants Wells Fargo, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems,
Inc., MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company (“the
Mortgage Defendants”) (Docket No. 6), Lisa Roach (Docket No. 16), and Eugene
Jaskiewicz (Docket No. 21); Plaintiff Kenneth Taggart’s (“Plaintiff”)’s Responses in
Opposition and Motion to Remand (Docket Nos. 11 and 22); the Mortgage Defendants’
Reply (Docket No. 13); and Plaintiff’s Sur Reply and Motion to Stay (Docket No. 14), it
is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is DENIED;
2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay is DENIED;
3. Counts One, Two, Three, and Six of Plaintiff’s Complaint are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
4. Counts Four and Five of Plaintiff’s Complaint are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.

5. Plaintiff has twenty (20) days in which to file an Amended Complaint.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.