TAGGART et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al

Filing 50

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 5/30/2017. 5/30/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH J. TAGGART, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, FILED V. MAY 3 0 2017 NO. 16-00063 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., B KATE BARKMAN, Cfer11 Y. Dep. Cf13r1, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 30" day of May, 2017, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint by Defendants Wells Fargo, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company (Docket No. 32), and Plaintiff Kenneth Taggart's Response in Opposition and Motion to Stay (Docket No. 35), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in its entirety; 2. The Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. The Plaintiff's Motion to Stay is DENIED. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as closed. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: ~t~NGEL,J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?