TAGGART et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
Filing
50
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 5/30/2017. 5/30/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH J. TAGGART,
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,
FILED
V.
MAY 3 0 2017
NO. 16-00063
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
B KATE BARKMAN, Cfer11
Y.
Dep. Cf13r1,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this
30" day
of May, 2017, upon consideration of the Motion to
Dismiss the Amended Complaint by Defendants Wells Fargo, N.A., Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., and Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Company (Docket No. 32), and Plaintiff Kenneth Taggart's Response in
Opposition and Motion to Stay (Docket No. 35), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in its entirety;
2. The Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
and
3. The Plaintiff's Motion to Stay is DENIED.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as closed.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
~t~NGEL,J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?