TAGGART et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
Filing
56
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/28/2017. 7/28/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH J. TAGGART,
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-0063
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s
motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 51) and the defendants’ response in opposition
(Docket No. 54), it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is
DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?