TAGGART et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al

Filing 56

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/28/2017. 7/28/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH J. TAGGART, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0063 ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 51) and the defendants’ response in opposition (Docket No. 54), it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?