BARNES v. BROWN et al
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 15 ) IS GRANTED; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS, JOHN BROWN, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, AND LUIS CAMPOS, AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, TRACIE BARNES, ON COUNT I (VIOLATIONS OF 42 U. S.C. § 1983) OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT; THE REMAINING STATE LAW CAUSES OF ACTION IN THE AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/26/16. 9/26/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN BROWN, NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY, and LUIS CAMPOS,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-214
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2016, after considering the defendants’ motion
for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 15), the plaintiff’s response (Doc. No. 16), the
defendants’ reply (Doc. No. 17), and the various documents attached to the aforementioned
filings; accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it
is hereby ORDERED as follows:
The motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED;
Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the defendants, John Brown, Northampton
County, and Luis Campos, and against the plaintiff, Tracie Barnes, on Count I (violations of 42
U.S.C. § 1983) of the amended complaint;
The remaining state law causes of action in the amended complaint are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and
The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?