RIVERA v. SOMMERS et al
Filing
55
ORDERED THE PETITIONER'S LETTER REQUEST 53 TO REINSTATE HIS APPEAL RIGHTS IS DENIED AS WE LACK A BASIS TO REOPEN THE APPEAL TIME UNDER FED. R. APP. P.4(A)(6). SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/29/20. 1/30/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AMILi CAR RIVAS RIVERA
v.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-456
SUPT. JACK SOMMERS, et al.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2020, upon considering the Petitioner's January 7,
2020 Response (ECF Doc. No. 53) to our November 6, 2019 Order (ECF Doc. No. 51) seeking to
restore his rights to appeal (ECF Doc. No. 50) our October 30, 2017 Order (ECF Doc. No. 49),
consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 77, and for reasons in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Petitioner's letter request (ECF Doc. No. 53) to reinstate his
appeal rights is DENIED as we lack a basis to reopen the appeal time under Fed. R. App. P.
4(a)(6).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?