WARREN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al

Filing 149

ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: ALL CLAIMS AND CROSS-CLAIMS (INCLUDING THE CROSS-CLAIMS ASSERTED BY DEFENDANTS JENNIFER SANCHEZ AND KURT STAMETZ [DOC. NO. 70]) THAT REMAINED AFTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS SETTLED PURSUANT TO THE ORDER ENTERED ON NOVEMBER 17, 2020, BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS [DOC. NO. 142]. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/28/21. 10/28/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANIEL WARREN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-643 v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of October 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification for Appeal [Doc. No. 147], the procedural posture of which is further discussed in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: All claims and cross-claims (including the cross-claims asserted by Defendants Jennifer Sanchez and Kurt Stametz [Doc. No. 70]) that remained after summary judgment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as settled pursuant to the Order entered on November 17, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells [Doc. No. 142]. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?