WARREN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
Filing
149
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: ALL CLAIMS AND CROSS-CLAIMS (INCLUDING THE CROSS-CLAIMS ASSERTED BY DEFENDANTS JENNIFER SANCHEZ AND KURT STAMETZ [DOC. NO. 70]) THAT REMAINED AFTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS SETTLED PURSUANT TO THE ORDER ENTERED ON NOVEMBER 17, 2020, BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS [DOC. NO. 142]. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/28/21. 10/28/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DANIEL WARREN,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-643
v.
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of October 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s unopposed
Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification for Appeal [Doc. No. 147], the procedural
posture of which is further discussed in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: All claims and cross-claims (including
the cross-claims asserted by Defendants Jennifer Sanchez and Kurt Stametz [Doc. No. 70]) that
remained after summary judgment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as settled pursuant to
the Order entered on November 17, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells
[Doc. No. 142].
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?