ADAMS et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO (DOC. NO. 12) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO (DOC. NO. 12) IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT I ONLY, AND DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT PHELAN (DOC. NO. 13) IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 4/13/17. 4/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FRANK ADAMS and CHRISTIE A. ADAMS,
Ind. & as H/W,
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and PHELAN,
HALLINAN, DIAMOND & JONES LLP,
formerly known as
PHELAN, HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP,
AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Wells
Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 12) and Defendant Phelan’s Motion to Dismiss
(Docket No. 13), and all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the
accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The motion of Defendant Wells Fargo (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part;
2. The motion of Defendant Wells Fargo (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED as
to Count I only, and DENIED in all other respects;
3. The motion of Defendant Phelan (Docket No. 13) is DENIED in its
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?