ADAMS et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al

Filing 23

OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO (DOC. NO. 12) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO (DOC. NO. 12) IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT I ONLY, AND DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT PHELAN (DOC. NO. 13) IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 4/13/17. 4/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANK ADAMS and CHRISTIE A. ADAMS, Ind. & as H/W, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0907 v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and PHELAN, HALLINAN, DIAMOND & JONES LLP, formerly known as PHELAN, HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 12) and Defendant Phelan’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 13), and all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion of Defendant Wells Fargo (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. The motion of Defendant Wells Fargo (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED as to Count I only, and DENIED in all other respects; 3. The motion of Defendant Phelan (Docket No. 13) is DENIED in its entirety. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?